Your post is very well though out and written. However it seems that you assume the writers of the study actually believe what they wrote, rather than (as I assume) knowingly concocting an intellectual sounding load of crap designed to vilify critical thinking vax "hesitant" people as mentally defective, to frighten those on the fence to conform or else and to fabricate justifications to assault vax refusers with "innovative interventions." And of course to validate the sheeple's obedience and make them see critical thinking folks as wolves they need protection from.
This piece was thoughtful but the research it critiqued was a bit on the nose, like calling someone a conspiracy theorist to devalue their opinion. After that’s been done, even looking into it makes you vulnerable to the same charges
Your post is very well though out and written. However it seems that you assume the writers of the study actually believe what they wrote, rather than (as I assume) knowingly concocting an intellectual sounding load of crap designed to vilify critical thinking vax "hesitant" people as mentally defective, to frighten those on the fence to conform or else and to fabricate justifications to assault vax refusers with "innovative interventions." And of course to validate the sheeple's obedience and make them see critical thinking folks as wolves they need protection from.
This piece was thoughtful but the research it critiqued was a bit on the nose, like calling someone a conspiracy theorist to devalue their opinion. After that’s been done, even looking into it makes you vulnerable to the same charges