Full Disclosure: A Naturopath and a Homeopath Discuss the Latest ACIP Committee Votes
by Robert Scott Bell
Dr. Henry Ealy and Robert Scott Bell react to the votes made by RFK Jr’s new ACIP committee at their first CDC meeting reviewing new and existing vaccines. What’s our perspective on the new members engaging in the same allopathically biased rituals? Could this be a genuine sea change or more from the cult of pharmaceutical compliance?
We’re not so sure that the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has suddenly found its conscience. We would love to believe that the ACIP committee changed in a big way. However, it’s more like the more things change, the more they stay the same, albeit with a partial mercury reckoning. But let’s be clear even at the risk of upsetting some aligned with a MAHA agenda: It’s the same immunologically immature cult in different coats. We’d like to say it’s ignorance but in 2025 there is just too much information available. It’s a choice.
On a bonus June 27th broadcast of The Robert Scott Bell Show, I sat down with Dr. Henry Ealy to unpack what really went down at the latest ACIP meeting. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t reform. It was theater.
Yes, there was a split vote on the flu shot. Yes, there was a symbolic push to remove thimerosal from pediatric doses. And yes, for the first time in a long time, it looked like the committee wasn’t just rubber-stamping the next injection into the childhood schedule.
That split vote? It was over a recommendation, not a removal. That thimerosal “ban”? It only applies to multi-dose vials—which, conveniently, can be reformulated post-approval to include it anyway. The CDC even removed the Pink Book appendix that listed vaccine ingredients. Now, there’s no clear record of what’s in those vials. This isn’t transparency—it’s obfuscation. Even thimerosal-free shots in unit dose vials have residual mercury from the base components that are still preserved with you-know-what.
Dr. Ealy broke it down beautifully: they’ve moved from overt authoritarianism to palatable manipulation. The new ACIP members talk a better game. They ask tougher questions. But at the end of the day, they’re still bound to the same foundation of vaccine worship. They still accept antibody titers as stand-ins for real health. They still approve products based on statistical illusions, not clinical outcomes. They still vote as if the Holy Grail of immunology is the antibody and nothing else matters. Not the liver. Not the kidneys. Not the brain and nervous system. Not even the microbiome.
Their willingness to sacrifice everything for the antibody is like providing a pair of binoculars to an immune system tied down to the train tracks. Sure, you can see the train coming from a bit further away, but what good are they when you cannot get off the tracks?
Ignoring innate and adaptive immunity (and all other healthy metabolic cellular functions)—these new ACIP members still support the fundamental tenet of vaccinology: that you are born with a defective immune system AND you can only survive the environment you are born into by injecting foreign genetic chemical cocktails from birth forward. Why? So that your baby’s intoxicated/aggravated/adjuvanted immune system is triggered to produce antibodies, even when that developing immune system is INCAPABLE of doing so. In the case of adults with mature immune systems with the functional capability for antibody production, see the train track analogy above.
At best, as Dr. Ealy relates, vaccination induces artificial infection. RSB acknowledges that vaccination can suppress the expression of a disease, but that is not the same thing as true prevention. What would these allopaths on the committee say about driving acute, infectious (i.e. toxic) states into chronicity?
Isn’t that the driving force behind MAHA?
America is the most chronically ill nation on the planet, from childhood through to our elder years. Yet, we are to celebrate a committee that votes to approve the most critical components of BIG PHARMA’s disease creation and management machinery. Maybe at the next ACIP meeting they’ll vote to remove those shots on the schedule that have never undergone inert placebo-controlled studies for safety specifically for approval. We know, it’s incremental.
No, it’s actually MENTAL. The intellectual handicap of allopathic philosophy is a fundamental abandonment of NATURE. Their prime directive is to CONQUER nature, not honor and learn from it. There is no better example than the childhood vaccine schedule courtesy of ACIP and the CDC.
What this meeting revealed was a shift in strategy, not in philosophy. The cult of the needle learned how to smile while injecting. They learned how to split votes just enough to show “diversity of thought,” while maintaining the same rituals of approval. It’s the ACIP version of controlled opposition.
We even talked about the mRNA flu shots—yes, they’re coming. And ACIP is laying the groundwork to normalize it, just like they did with COVID. These are built on the Arcturus platform—self-amplifying mRNA that, according to Ealy, can replicate inside the body and potentially affect people around the vaccinated. That’s not medicine. That’s a bioweapon in disguise.
So what’s the takeaway?
It’s certainly not to expect salvation from ACIP. It’s to stop giving them authority over your children.
We don’t need better votes. We need exit strategies. We need parents who say, “Not in my house.” We need local communities who refuse CDC schedules entirely. We need doctors who tear up the playbook and go back to patient-first practice in support of natural immunity, not infection by injection. We need more naturopaths, homeopaths, chiropractors, herbalists and all the other healing modalities whose fundamental philosophy begins with VITALISM.
VITAL FORCE, not materialistic molecular reductionism rooted in collectivism. One size does not fit all. There is no drug that even an allopathic doctor says is so good, perfect and right that it should be given to everyone at the same dose and on the same schedule. So how do they explain the childhood vaccine schedule?
It isn’t just bad science. It’s a religion. A cult of Asclepius. A pharmaceutical priesthood prescribing immunological and neurological harm and calling it preventive care. Poison for profit. If you think a few new members can reform the dogma of generations of Flexner Report indoctrinated true believers, your vital force may be leaking.
The power to heal has never belonged to ACIP. It belongs to you. But only if you reclaim it.
So while some in the new media celebrate the illusion of dissent and the slow, scripted nods toward “reform,” I’ll keep saying what Dr. Ealy and I said on air:
This is still a cult. Maybe slightly better as the new members acknowledge that injected mercury is bad. However, as homeopaths and naturopaths, we would call that a Moment of Duh over 200 years too late. Credibility? Have they even heard of Samuel Hahnemann? How about homeoprophylaxis?
Perhaps we should erect a sign at the next ACIP committee meeting at CDC:
CAUTION: Slow Doctors at Play (with syringes)
If that appears a little insulting, we’ll risk it considering the sacrificing of generations of children and adults at the hands of ACIP/CDC and the unconscionable vaccine schedule.
We declare the truth as it was acknowledged in the US Supreme Court case Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 562 U.S. 223 (2011): these products are unavoidably unsafe. Why else do vaccines require liability protection when they are placed on the recommended childhood schedule? Why are they mandated for children? Why are there many still under the jurisdiction of the HHS that would like nothing more than to find a way to mandate vaccinations for EVERYONE?
Yes, we acknowledge the small step forward with a bit less mercury, but the ACIP committee still voted to recommend unavoidably unsafe medical interventions under the guise that they are the only way to protect children and pregnant women from flu.
Don’t get us started on the phony PCR test they use to convince us that we, and our chickens will all die unless we get flu shots for everyone.
Say it out loud. Say it often. These products are unavoidably unsafe. Your immune system is not broken, unless it’s been assaulted by ACIP committee votes.
The change we seek is not a function of anyone’s vote. Your immune system does not belong to ACIP.
It’s the choice you make to unplug from the madness of medicine masquerading as immune salvation. Say no and mean it.
It’s long past time to recognize that the source of all healing comes naturally when you reconnect to your divinity. From that, everything else flows.
The power to heal is yours.
WATCH THE SPECIAL BROADCAST HERE
We don’t need better votes. We need exit strategies. We need parents who say, “Not in my house.” We need local communities who refuse CDC schedules entirely. We need doctors who tear up the playbook and go back to patient-first practice in support of natural immunity, not infection by injection. We need more naturopaths, homeopaths, chiropractors, herbalists and all the other healing modalities whose fundamental philosophy begins with VITALISM. Brilliant!
"At best, as Dr. Ealy relates, vaccination induces artificial infection. RSB acknowledges that vaccination can suppress the expression of a disease, but that is not the same thing as true prevention."
When is it ever a good idea to suppress expression? This is happening on every level and it works the same way in a body as it does in movement or in a population. You can't suppress expression without creating pathology. Suppress a pathogen, suppress a voice, suppress a movement... it will become inflamed and disrupt its environment until it is cleared.
Acute febrile illness is the body expressing a pathogen - clearing something that doesn't serve it. Vaccines try to force the body to bury the pathogen deep in its own resources, where it can do the most damage, so that it can't express/create symptoms. But a suppressed pathogen creates inflammation that consumes those resources beyond the boundaries (skin, digestive and respiratory tract) that would normally keep it from penetrating more deeply. It's like capturing one of many enemies and imprisoning him in your house to ensure your safety. You use up your own energy and resources and disrupt your own life by trying to keep him contained and it changes the whole environment. Preoccupation. Permanent hypervigilance. Paranoia. Autoimmunity.
But suppression is their go-to. That's why they thought it was a good idea to confine Covid positive patients in nursing homes - isolating them where they could do the most damage. Either they don't know any better or they know exactly what they're doing.